Canon 16-35 F2.8 L II; Priced similar as option 1, I get a single-lens solution, but this lens has got some critical review since III version came, but third version is LOT expensive too. I am confused if this is good or better than Option 1, then I can simply get this lens for both astro and landscape usage. Option 3. Canon 16-35 F2.8 L III
Review 1. Introducción. El Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L III es un objetivo profesional, que ofrece una excelente calidad de imagen. Esta tercera versión tiene una óptica mejorada con respecto a la anterior y es más luminosa que el EF 16-35mm f/4L IS, aunque no está estabilizada. También es más cara, de echo ese es su principal inconveniente. For this reason we're not going to consider this lens for use on the APS-C platform in this review. Canon 16-35mm F2.8L III USM Headline Features. Fully weather-sealed construction; F2.8 maximum aperture; 16-35mm focal range; Sub-wavelength Coatings (SWC) and Air Sphere Coatings (ASC) to eliminate lens flare and ghosting Canon has been on a roll of producing very well rounded lenses with strong performance as of late, and this lens is no exception. It is somewhat of a hybrid between Canon two previous L series wide angle zooms (the EF 17-40mm f/4L and the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II), adopting the aperture of the former and the focal length of the latter. It also adds Where to buy. The new benchmark for wide angle zoom lenses. Wide angle zoom lens. Broad landscapes. Constant f/2.8 aperture for great low light. EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM. Features. Specifications. Hai friends, I am using Canon EOS 70D with Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM for marriage programmes with 50mm f/1.4 for portrait. The above combination gives me satisfied results. View review in forums Leave a comment on this review In real world testing the sharpness at the edges of the frame when wide open on the older f/2.8 lens seems sharper at 16mm and softer at 35mm. Ironically, the inverse is the case for the f/4 which seems to be sharper in the center of the frame but softer at the edges at 16mm than the f/2.8, yet much better than the f/2.8 lens at 35mm. The EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM is rather squat, measuring 4.2 by 3.5 inches (HD) without the included hood attached; the hood adds about two inches to the height. It weighs 2.1 pounds, a bit less than Design. The EF 35mm f/1.4L II ($1,999.00 at Amazon) is on the large side for a prime lens, but that's the case with most 35mm f/1.4 designs. It measures 4.2 by 3.2 inches (HD), weighs 1.7 pounds hCZ7J.
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/777
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/207
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/809
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/854
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/945
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/772
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/832
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/194
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/424
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/279
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/554
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/77
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/449
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/358
  • 895pykaq07.pages.dev/848

    • canon ef 16 35mm f 2.8 l iii usm review